Hi, all!
Just a quick one:
Magnus Berg wrote:
> This means that since we're very well aware of the computer viruses and the
> Internet and we're only 4 level beings, they can't be L5.
I don't think computer viruses are an example of level five [perhaps they are something almost
as profound--an example of level four having mediated the chain of connection to a point of
direct externally stored intellectual patterns being able to interact without a biological
interface (without a person to process the interaction). This doesn't constitute an "escape"
from the limitations of intellect, just from the limitations of biology. (And if I've missed
the point through neglecting LS, I'll apologize right here.)]
But it's the logic behind this statement that makes me want to say "Hold it!"
If there is a level five, and we can perceive it somehow, then I would think that means "we" are
level 5 beings (including, of course, all the lower levels).
And we MAY be able to perceive L5, but not have socialized new intellectual patterns to use to
share the concepts among ourselves. Just as we humans all are contained in the intellectual
level, whether we participate consciously or not, (because our society, biology, and inorganic
selves have been affected by intellect), if a new freedom from intellect has become stable
enough to repeat itself, then anything that is aware of it or affected by it in any way is
contained in a level 5 pattern, therefore IS a level 5 being.
So I don't see any validity in restricting us and our perceptions to level 4.
Cheers, and thanks!
Maggie
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:33 BST