Diana, Renee, Paul, Roger and Group.
7th Oct Roger Parker wrote:
> Diana writes:
>> " As we stand at the moment the "feels good" aesthetic explanation
>> of DQ works well at the subjective level while the "possibilities"
>> explanation looks like it might have something in common with
>> quantum physics and so would be a good objective explanation.
>> But, like I said, what we need to do is combine them."
> Diana, I absolutely love your postings!
DIANA. Your message was an inspired piece of writing, what I
am picking at is just something that you sent up as a test balloon
anyway, for instance that 'feels good' works well on the subjective
level.
Principally there is no subjective level in the MOQ (in a
metaphysical sense), except as I have proposed seeing the static
Intellectual level as subject/object splitting itself.
Now, as this month's topic is Dynamic Quality you will probably say
that references to STATIC quality isn't valid, but the various
static levels are experience and EXPERIENCE IS QUALITY.
"Feeling" is as much the experience at the Inorganic level as at the
Biological, Social or Intellctual ones. The universal order is a
MORAL order!!
I guess you by "objective" means the Inorganic level and that
"possibilities" is Matter's choise But I don't see the need for an
objective explanation any more than a subjectiv one.
ROGER PARKER picked up the thread:
> My concern as we begin to delve into DQ and quantum physics is how we tie in
> the "Many Worlds" interpretation of quantum reality into DQ.....talk about
> "possibilities"....... I am just planting a seed for now, but I can't get it
> out of my mind as we discuss DQ and Purpose. Hope I am not retracing old
> ground for the LS?
"Possibilities" as pertaining to the many-worlds interpretation" of
Quantum Physics? Yes, but this (and other explanations of the
strange implications of QP) is but SOM-necessitated "rubbish" ;-). In
the MOQ world there is nothing strange about matter discontinuity,
dead-living cats, particle pair communication or wave
function/particle position (which necessitated the said MW theory).
RENEE RIU experiences DQ when watching the moon close to the horizon.
Yes, I know that feeling, for me also when looking at the star-strewn
sky or a blazing northern light. It gives me the shivers: how can
people go about their ordinary business under such an awesome
backdrop? And exactly as you say: no wonder that the heavenly
phenomenons were seen as deities once upon a time.
PAUL VOGEL writes:
>> ....Quality can be found in any of the four levels.
Oh yes. The dynamism is perhaps lesser (the "laws" more rigid) the
older the patterns, but static patterns are value/experience never
the less. Waves in water are water too!
Bodvar
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:35 BST