On Wed, 21 Oct 1998 Xcto@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 98-10-19 16:49:03 EDT, you write:
>
> << One question is whether a metaphysics at a high level can be packaged for
> comsumption at a lower level at all! I think generally not. Without
> quantifying what a 'level' is, I would say that all of us are able to
> comprehend ideas about one level beyond where we currently are. That's
> our growing edge or realizable potential. If there is a gap of two of
> more 'levels' the jump is too great and there is non-comprehension. The
> MOQ paradigm, imo, has much greater explanatorinesss than the SOM for
> understanding experience, but perhaps it's more than a 'level' on average.
> :) As someone else has already said, our job then becomes to internalize
> the perceived quality on our growing edge (MOQ in this case) and live in a
> way that reflects this understanding of life and the universe (true for
> any religion :) If we're right in perceiving MOQ as a higher 'level',
> and if there is a general evolutionary movement towards higher quality
> (debatable of course), then the collective will move inexorably towards
> MOQ over _time_. >>
>
> vygotsky, right?
Hey, you could be right; that was an idea I came across so long ago I
forgot how it came up--rang with an intuitive truth to me. Don
>
>
> homepage - http://www.moq.org
> queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
> unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
> body of email
>
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:36 BST