In a message dated 98-10-22 01:19:22 EDT, Roger wrote:
<< 1)Experience is dynamic as opposed to static?Or that
2)Static patterns of quality depend upon DQ? That without the Dynamic there
is
nothing? Or that
3)Static patterns of Quality are like maps of the terrain ?
I do share all three assumptions and will gladly re-examine why . However I
don't see these as essential to the argument that MOQ is a superior
description of quantum reality than is SOM. MOQ is broader and it goes
deeper. Even if I could comprehend "static experience", or could envision SQ
without DQ, it doesn't negate that the MOQ is a better description of reality
than SOM. >>
I agree with two and three, but I think you can see for yourself that
experience can be both dynamic and static. Learn anything new? hey it's going
to be dynamic. But looking a the sun rise in the morning will generally be a
static enterprise that reaffirms your static belief that the sun will rise
tomorrow. Unless, of course you decide to write a sonnet comparing your true
love to the dawns early light.
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:36 BST