Diana (and XCTO),
You asked me to review my underlying assumptions on static and dynamic
quality. I have done this in my write-up defining Dynamic quality, which
should have the same date as does this post. Below are the specific answers
to the three earlier assumptions I was making, but please read this as an
extension of the other post.........this is not a stand-alone document.
1) Is experience Dynamic or static?
Experience is the quality event. The cutting edge of this is Dynamic
quality. This is the source of all. SQ lies in the wake of experience.
2) Does static quality depend on DQ?
Neither can survive without the other. However, I am not sure that this
implies that there can be no DQ without SQ, just that it can't survive or
last. On the other hand, SQ doesn't even come about without DQ. Conditioned
reality cannot exist without reality.
3) Are static patterns of quality like maps?
Cartographic output (a map), is one example of SQ, but the term is much
broader than this. SQ is derived from the quality experience or event. It
includes subjects, objects, maps, cartographers, customs, and the Lila Squad.
Everyone's insights and critiques are welcome......but please read this with
its sister document!
Be Good All....... And Passionate!
Roger Parker
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:36 BST