You said that SQ can't exist without DQ because it is the "wake" of the
experience. You were not sure if that implied DQ can exist without SQ. I
don't believe it can. After all, if there is no static latching point,
then what is behaving dynamically?
Rick
At 06:35 PM 10/24/98 EDT, you wrote:
>Diana (and XCTO),
>
>You asked me to review my underlying assumptions on static and dynamic
>quality. I have done this in my write-up defining Dynamic quality, which
>should have the same date as does this post. Below are the specific answers
>to the three earlier assumptions I was making, but please read this as an
>extension of the other post.........this is not a stand-alone document.
>
>1) Is experience Dynamic or static?
> Experience is the quality event. The cutting edge of this is Dynamic
>quality. This is the source of all. SQ lies in the wake of experience.
>
>2) Does static quality depend on DQ?
> Neither can survive without the other. However, I am not sure that this
>implies that there can be no DQ without SQ, just that it can't survive or
>last. On the other hand, SQ doesn't even come about without DQ.
Conditioned
>reality cannot exist without reality.
>
>3) Are static patterns of quality like maps?
> Cartographic output (a map), is one example of SQ, but the term is much
>broader than this. SQ is derived from the quality experience or event. It
>includes subjects, objects, maps, cartographers, customs, and the Lila
Squad.
>
>Everyone's insights and critiques are welcome......but please read this with
>its sister document!
>
>Be Good All....... And Passionate!
>
>Roger Parker
>
>
>homepage - http://www.moq.org
>queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
>unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
>body of email
>
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:36 BST