Donald T Palmgren wrote:
> It looks like Morality is way out front -- awfully broad, but
> intresting. All of the suggestions look good to me! (Including Myths and
> symbols in Pirsig's books! Wow!) But I'll make a new one just to have it
> on the table. How about: Anthony's Essay. Diana, if you really want to
> find out where we all stand on our various interpritations of the MoQ, a
> good way to do it would be for us to examine Anthony's essay -- state what
> we dissagree w/, make suggestions, find weak points, 'this is too vague,'
> 'you've got this all wrong,' and so on.
It's a great idea. I think the key to getting anywhere in this
discussion is focusing on a specific question or statement, that way
you're really forced to think about it. In fact the perfect Lila Squad
would only ever debate one single question - it wouldn't even matter
what that question was. As in "Does Lila have quality?" in order to
answer it, and I mean really answer it, you have to examine every single
assumption our culture is based on, so inadvertantly you end up
answering everything else at the same time.
However that's probably a bit ambitious, Anthony's essay provides a good
latching point from which to reach for greater understanding.
Diana
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:36 BST