THE MAD IRISHMAN GETS A SAN FRANCISCO TREAT!
subtitle: Roger chats with Fintan on the Metaphysics of Roger and then (in
preparation for Thanksgiving) talks TURKEY
Fintan,
My God man......what hour is it over there?
FINTAN writes:
<< <<<<<<<<<<
As far as I am concerned, then if Pirsig is wrong and Roger or Rick are
right,
then let's BY ALL MEANS toss out the MOQ and replace it with the MOR.
Or rather lets amend, extend and correct Pirsig into a new MOQ.
Here in this Squad, Quality, after all, is what WE like !
To that end , I just DID add a quantum level to my latest post!
>>>>>>>>>
I agree. Last month I wrote something about the need to static-latch once in
a while on our interpretation of what is the MOQ, and to dynamically-unlatch
on our own directions. The key isn't one or the other , but both. However, I
think it is important to distinguish the static-- MOQ-- from our own
directions. I tried to find my old post, or XCTO's response, but it is
getting late in California.......so heck with it.
By the way, now that we have trashed politics, let's continue to dig into
Religion.
Fintan, why do you have a problem with intellectual patterns? You said
yourself that the social level on its own has done some pretty wretched stuff
in the name of Christianity. It seems to me that the problem on both levels is
BAD PATTERNS. I see Christianity and science as good things that are sometimes
abused, or HIJACKED by lower levels.
Do you have a problem with the levels, or with some specific patterns within
them?
Roger
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:39 BST