Re: MD The 98 Percent Solution?

From: Magnus Berg (McMagnus@hem2.passagen.se)
Date: Fri Mar 26 1999 - 15:23:46 GMT


Hi again

Kevin wrote:
> << all before the Big Bang was Dynamic Quality

Hmm... I'm not so sure about that anymore. First of all, it seems a little strange that each lower level is more static than the level above. Then suddenly the "level" below the inorganic is nothing but dynamic.

My thinking goes something like this:
Suppose there is a level below the inorganic level, this level would be more static than the inorganic, let's call it the quantum level. The quantum level doesn't look very static to me or anyone else I assume. The challenge here is to discover the pattern
of that level and would leave ~88% of the MoQ uncharted.

My approach to this challenge, and other level problems, is to look at the levels above (or below) and compare their interrelationships. In this case, the quantum level looks chaotic to the inorganic level, but when we step up one level, we see that the
inorganic level looks equally chaotic to the biological level. The only way we can taste a bar of chocolate, (the "hello world" example of a biological SPoV), is to consume it, and then it's gone. The biological Quality Event is the only biologically real
"thing" and if we want to experience it again, we have to take another bite and consume some more.

The same thing happens when we observe a quantum event, we call the inorganic QE the observation and this observation consumes the lower level patterns just as the tasting consumes the inorganic patterns of the chocolate bar.

Maybe I'd better stop here for now, let me know if someone's interested to discuss this in depth.

        Magnus

MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:54 BST