Hello Squad,
Before I hop on that train let me tell you all:
TTTTTTHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEERRRRRRRREEEEEE IIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSS
AAAAAAA GGGGGGGGOOOOOOODDDDDDD.
I was yelling!,
Thanks Struan, Horse and Fred
But wait a minute isn't there any way to bring the lost sheeps into the
herd???? Especially when they show potential???
Just a Thought!
Mas Besos a todos (even you BOB)
Carmenci.
Horse wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Bob, have you ever bothered to read Zen or Lila all the way through or
> have you just skimmed the odd couple of pages here and there.
> Add to this your overt bigotry and wonderful ability to mis-read
> virtually every item you quote and the end result comes across as
> incredible ignorance and prejudice.
> Laugh?? - I nearly did.
>
> On 30 May 99, at 23:00, Bob Wallace wrote:
> > > Carmen Flynn wrote:
> > >
> > >First of all let me remind you both of another 'scientific fact':
> > >The IQ test is not a good tool to measure 'intellect', it is a heavily
> > >biased tool to favor whites. Heavily Biased to benefit the so call
> > >'non-minorities'.
> > Bob replies:
> > This is not true. The tests have been around for over 100 and have
> > evolved to the point where they are highly accurate. They are such
> > an incredibly sore point they can barely be discussed.
>
> They are a sore point because they are so thoroughly discredited no-
> one of any intelligence or integrity uses them for anything other than
> what they are - a means to espouse a particular thought system for a
> particular group. As a general intelligence indicator of homo sapiens
> they are worthless.
>
> On 30 May 99, at 23:00, Bob Wallace wrote:
> > Does anyone in this group besides me understand
> > economics?
>
> You see more value in addressing the personal habits of those you
> dislike rather than addressing the arguments they propose.
> Your failure to understand the difference between Biology and
> Intellect is stunning. Your placing of Socialism in the Biological Level
> appears to stem from your dislike of Marx - whose personal habits
> you seem to feel are of more importance than his ideas - and you fail
> to understand the difference between Socialism and Marxist
> Socialism - two distinct theories. Note the word theory - this is
> Intellect not Biology. You ask if anyone else on the list understands
> economics and fail to see the irony in your question. Marx was an
> economist and historian (and in part a philosopher - hence the links
> with Hegel in his theories) and Marxism (Marxist Socialism) is an
> ECONOMIC theory. Have you ever bothered to read a single word of
> Marx or do you let others do your reading and thinking for you.
> Your own thinking seems to be more in line with National Socialism.
> You continue to espouse the idea of a free market (a myth) and the
> wonders of Capitalism in the same way that a small child parrots the
> beliefs of its parents.
> In short Bob you are the stuff of dreams for the Corporate Hitlers and
> the governments you appear to dislike - you swallow their myths and
> lies, hook line and sinker without ever going to the trouble of
> questioning their motives. Did you ever get around to reading the MAI
> information available all over the Internet or is that too much trouble?
>
> On 30 May 99, at 23:00, Bob Wallace wrote:
>
> > > Carmen: HELLOOOOO, a couple of trees don't make a forest.
> > >
> > Bob replies:
> > Quite right. But 4,000 years of recorded history does make a
> > forest, a forest in which socialism (a biological value) has not had
> > one success.
>
> Really Bob, is that right? So the Christian ethic was based on what?
> Screw thy neighbour? or do unto others before they do it to you? or
> lets all make lots of money and take it to heaven when we die?
> Perhaps in defence of another glaring mistake you would like to tell
> us all about the terrible personal habits of Jesus (of which I'm sure he
> had many - I suppose you didn't get around to reading the
> Apocryphal New Testament either). What was his IQ? Of course he
> espoused the merits of the free market in the temple didn't he? And
> he probably sold the loaves and fishes to make a bit of spare cash.
>
> Why not try reading Lila again Bob. This time with an open mind and
> without the idea of justifying your strange and warped notions.
>
> Horse
>
> "Making history, it turned out, was quite easy.
> It was what got written down.
> It was as simple as that!"
> Sir Sam Vimes.
>
> MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
> MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:59 BST