Hi Bill
On 14 Jul 99, at 21:36, elg14 wrote:
> Alright then. Let the Lila Squad take up an issue in committee, in a
> focused group. When it has pounded the issue into some shape and form,
> let the issue then go before the MD as is or is not required for for final
> shaping.
Sounds good to me.
> But what then? Leave the issue "spread out" in the archives.
> Can you (moq.org) afford an extra archive dedicated to recording some kind
> of general summation regarding the monthly issue (for the unwashed
> masses)?
There's plenty of space on the site itself, we wouldn't need an
archive. If this were to happen it could be given space on the site
rather than being tucked away in an archive. I'd love to see this
happen.
>
> If the committee summation wanted to be challenged, the issue could be
> re-opened in MD. If confusion still reigned, the issue could then be
> opened again in committee. Sort of a commitee-to-general
> floor-to-commitee-to general floor etc. kinda thing.
Sounds better all the time. If anyone would care to discuss this
seriously I'm happy to join in - privately or on MD.
Horse
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:07 BST