ROGER AGREES WITH CURTIS THAT WE NEED
SOME REAL-LIFE EXAMPLES OF THE DQ/SQ
SEPARATION
To Curtis, Bo, and the Reality gang,
CURTIS WROTE:
Assume I am making plans to do something-or-other. The plan-making process
is definitely DQ. (esp. if it's something I've never done before, like
sky-diving). Does that mean that when I actually jump out the airplane, it's
SQ? I must admit I am confused on this issue.
ROGER:
Allow me to rephrase the summary from my last two posts(general though it is).
1) DQ is everyday Direct Experience, by which we mean pre-subject and
pre-object and pre-conceptual. DQ is the changing flux of reality. In RMP's
words, it is "The ongoing Dynamic edge of all experience, both positive and
negative, even the dynamic edge of thought itself."
2) SQ is subjectified and objectified patterns. These are conceptual
models that are our best representations of pre-conceptual experience. These
are often confused with reality because (to quote the only person I know of
with a PHD in MOQ, Anthony McWatt) "they have become such a common apparatus
for describing, understanding and analysing that reality."
CURTIS:
Oh, and can I suggest that we stick closely to the example given here
instead of making too many generalizations?
ROGER:
Okay. The preconceptual experience, even the preconceptual process of
thinking itself is DQ. Your preconceptual planning and jumping experiences
are DQ. Your concepts , words and memories, your divisions of yourself from
the plane, and of your thoughts from the external world are all conceptual
models, hence, sq.
Please read my two prior Reality posts for for any needed elaboration and
explanations.
Roger
PS -- Bo, does your SOLAQI concept align with what you said about s/o
logic's limitations?
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:09 BST