> I don't even know where to begin in responding to your idea that static
> and Dynamic are the same. I don't think you and I are talking about the
> same book. Your interpetation seems vague and solipsistic to me, which
> is about the last thing Pirsig intended.
i agree with that entirely, but i think people all too often get caught up
in the detail of topic when you should start on the vagueties of it all.
maybe it's because i only read the book a few months ago and so havent spent
years analysing it which it seems apparent that some of those writing here
have. i think i should read the book again, but still see the value (for
want of a better word) in looking at this vaguely as well as in detail.
sometimes we over analyse things, losing sight of what we were looking for
in the first place.
Don't get me wrong. I can
> appreciate an honest difference of opinion, but I also think a person
> can be just plain wrong.
i hear what you are saying here too, but as it stands i dont think i am.
hopefully, if i am wrong, you will show me why i am wrong and not just
dismiss me saying "you are wrong" i get nothing from that.
regards
Rich.
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:14 BST