RE: MD Has Quality been divided?

From: Erin N. (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2002 - 21:02:15 GMT

  • Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Has Quality been divided?"

    I guess what is bothering me is that static and dynamic are adjectives
    of the same *thing*.
    I thought as the levels increase they offer more flexibility
    or are more dynamic no?
    It sounds like this to me:
    food = hot food + cold food
    and then you want to say hot and cold food are mutually
    exclusive?
    erin

    STEVE: I'm still going with Quality=SQ+DQ where both SQ and DQ could be
    thought of
    >as the "edge" of Quality depending on the perspective. I think erin and
    >Peter are saying SQ is contained within DQ. (correct me if I'm wrong, erin
    >and Peter.) Davor (or anyone), What do you think?
    >
    >Steve
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 13 2002 - 20:57:09 GMT