From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 14:16:55 GMT
Hi Matt:
I wonder what you think of the following exchange posted by Horse on
20 Nov. My guess would be you disagree with the Jonathan, Rick and
Horse.
> On 17 Nov 2002 at 9:02, Jonathan B. Marder wrote:
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > HORSE
> > And a conclusion is another name for a judgement!
> >
> > RICK
> > Sure. But under Jon's theory, "observation" is also a synonym for
> > "judgment" (since "judgment" = "conclusion" and "conclusion" =
> > "everything").
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > JONATHAN
> > I like it! I think by using the word "judgement", Horse was alluding to
> > (evaluation of) quality (right Horse?).
>
HORSE
> What else is there?
>
> We observe, we evaluate, we conlude.. We can do nothing else. Our whole
> existence is spent in judgement.
>
JONATHAN
> >
> > If that is so, Rick boils it down to Quality = Everything. How very
> > Pirsigian!!!
HORSE
>
> And as everything = reality then Quality = reality. Nice!
In case there's any doubt, I agree with the three gentlemen. They have
summarized the MoQ about as directly and succinctly as you can get.
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 20 2002 - 14:17:36 GMT