Re: MD Individuality

From: Elizaphanian (Elizaphanian@members.v21.co.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 22:58:52 GMT

  • Next message: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "Re: MD Individuality"

    Hi matt - I've sent a big message through to you on this but it doesn't seem
    to have got through. I'll give it another day or so and then re-send it if
    it doesn't appear.

    Sam
    www.elizaphanian.v-2-1.net/home.html

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Matt the Enraged Endorphin" <mpkundert@students.wisc.edu>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:50 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Individuality

    > Sam, Patrick,
    >
    > Matt:
    > Pragmatists think its just best to treat these things [pianos, trees,
    > geometry] as sentences that we can apply truth or falsity to, rather than
    > experiences that we can apply truth or falsity to.
    >
    > Patrick:
    > That's among the best oneliners I heard recently. Sounds very
    Wittgensteinian.
    >
    > Sam:
    > Just a quickie on this: it does sound Wittgensteinian, but I'm pretty sure
    > that Wittgenstein wouldn't agree with Matt that there is nothing outside
    > language. In fact I'm certain of it; it's something he would violently
    > object to!
    >
    > Matt:
    > Now, I have to acquiece to you on Wittegenstein, but I do want to clarify:
    > I don't want to say that there is or isn't anything outside of language.
    > The pragmatist, Sellers-Foucault hybrid "position" is that we don't want
    to
    > answer the question of whether there's anything outside of language.
    We're
    > satisfied with simply dealing with language. For instance, saying that
    > there is nothing outside of language makes it seem as if the tree doesn't
    > exist outside of language. When I punch a tree, I'm saying that I'm
    > punching the word "tree." But I do want to say that our knowledge of
    trees
    > and all of our sentences of trees and thoughts about trees are not pinned
    > on a "tree." They are internally coherent. They refer to each other. We
    > can make empirical observations, but these observations are in language.
    > Our observations can be _caused_ by an empirical world without them
    > refering to a reality "out there."
    >
    > Matt
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 21 2002 - 22:55:24 GMT