From: Erin N. (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Sat Dec 07 2002 - 03:26:22 GMT
>Erin,
>Thanks for the quotes. Do you agree with this re-wording:
Seems there is a question behind the
questions?
not sure what you are asking with the equal significance, same order
of acausal and causal.
>Two events are said to be acausal if they are related, but not
>causally. And synchronicity describes acausal events that occur
>at or near the same time but not by chance.
>
>Also, do you think that
>- events described by synchronicity should be freighted with
>significance on par with causal events?
>- as an explanatory principle synchronicity is on the same order
>as causality, as Jungian theory claims?
>- there is some similarity between the mindset that sees significance
>in unlikely events and one that treats all events as happening in a
>moral-based reality?
>Glenn
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 03:20:46 GMT