Re: MD Progression and benevolence

From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 02:56:07 GMT

Next message: Glenn Bradford: "RE: MD acausal (for Glenn)"

Previous message: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "Re: MD MOQ FOR DUMMIES, Please"
In reply to: Kevin: "RE: MD Progression and benevolence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Kevin.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin" <kevin@xap.com>
. Of course, I guess the next question is freedom and
> versatility to do what? Freedom and versatility for whom? For the
> pattern evolving? Or for DQ itself?
>

How about replacing "freedom and versality" with "creativity"? There is no
"for whom" required, that is, creativity for its own sake is what Quality is
all about. But creativity requires static latches (otherwise one has chaos),
so any static pattern will have some tendency to preserve itself. This is
only a problem when the static pattern is self-conscious, and thinks its
survival is a good in itself, as opposed to being a temporary part of a
general creative process.

- Scott

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Glenn Bradford: "RE: MD acausal (for Glenn)"
Previous message: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "Re: MD MOQ FOR DUMMIES, Please"
In reply to: Kevin: "RE: MD Progression and benevolence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 12 2002 - 02:57:29 GMT