From: Charles Roghair (ctr@pacificpartssales.com)
Date: Sat Aug 07 2004 - 22:49:39 BST
Hello everybody. Hello Ilya.
Ilya, your new term, DYNAMIC PRESSURE, sounds like AWARENESS to me.
AWARENESS ¨C n 1: having knowledge of; 2: state of elementary or
undifferentiated consciousness
Read:
> AWARENESS is experienced by person drive from static patters of his
> life toward unknown. Experienced by person force that drives him
> toward he does know what, you understand, Mark?
>
> If we use this new term, we don't have to define "AWARENESS" and
> explain what means saying that one person is more aware than another.
> We may just say that a person A experiences much more AWARENESS than a
> person B. Or, that a person A experiences much more AWARENESS at the
> moment of time t1 than he experienced at the moment of time t2.
>
> Now. If a person experiences little AWARENESS, he is dominated
> completely by static patterns. His life is tepid and measured. He may
> be more or less harmonious depending on how coherent his static
> pattern levels are, but he has comparatively little chances to become
> either mental hospital patient or great spiritual leader. He is
> ordinary very small detail in the body of the Giant.
>
> If a person experiences great AWARENESS, there are two possibilities.
> If this person's static pattern levels are very coherent, his life is
> a mistic experience of a great intensity. Example of such a person -
> Jesus Christ.
> If this person's static pattern levels are NOT coherent at all, it's
> hard to envy him. His life is complete nighmare. He is being torn
> apart by he doesn't understand what. In such a state some people seek
> rescue at psychoanalysts, some in religion, some in alcohol and drugs.
> Some may clench teeth tight and cling to whatever static patterns they
> had (and thus shut themselves from any possibility for growth). Some
> may stubbornly seek for Truth, Reason (or whatever they would call it)
> and eventually invent something like MOQ :-
>
As I was enjoy your thoughts on DYNAMIC PRESSURE, I noticed I was
simultaneously aware of AWARENOUS.
Thoughts?
Best regards,
Chuck
On Aug 7, 2004, at 12:51 PM, §ª§Ý§î§ñ §¬§à§â§à§Ò§Ü§à§Ó wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
> Vac>> 1. Can we say that person A is more Dynamic then person B?
> Vac>> Mark 4-8-04: This can be qualified because a 'person' is given
> quite a
> Vac>> detailed description in the MOQ: A person is dominated by a
> combination of four
> Vac>> levels of evolutionary related static patterns, Inorganic,
> Organic, Social and
> Vac>> Intellectual, and these levels are responding to DQ at the same
> time.
>
>
> You know, Mark, something troubles me in this description. It sounds
> too "objective" to me, that is, too far from what a certain human
> being (whatever his metaphysical status is) experiences. Maybe this
> description is all right as long as only phylosophy is concerned, but
> I feel it is not very convenient for psychology.
>
> I invented a new term today, DYNAMIC PRESSURE, and want to present it
> it to you and ask what you think about it.
>
> DYNAMIC PRESSURE is experienced by person drive from static patters of
> his life toward unknown. Experienced by person force that drives him
> toward he does know what, you understand, Mark?
>
> If we use this new term, we don't have to define "DYNAMICNESS" and
> explain what means saying that one person is more Dynamic than
> another. We may just say that a person A experiences much more DYNAMIC
> PRESSURE than a person B. Or, that a person A experiences much more
> DYNAMIC PRESSURE at the moment of time t1 than he experienced at the
> moment of time t2.
>
> Now. If a person experiences little DYNAMIC PRESSURE, he is dominated
> completely by static patterns. His life is tepid and measured. He may
> be more or less harmonious depending on how coherent his static
> pattern levels are, but he has comparatively little chances to become
> either mental hospital patient or great spiritual leader. He is
> ordinary very small detail in the body of the Giant.
>
> If a person experiences great DYNAMIC PRESSURE, there are two
> possibilities. If this person's static pattern levels are very
> coherent, his life is a mistic experience of a great intensity.
> Example of such a person - Jesus Christ.
> If this person's static pattern levels are NOT coherent at all, it's
> hard to envy him. His life is complete nighmare. He is being torn
> apart by he doesn't understand what. In such a state some people seek
> rescue at psychoanalysts, some in religion, some in alcohol and drugs.
> Some may clench teeth tight and cling to whatever static patterns they
> had (and thus shut themselves from any possibility for growth). Some
> may stubbornly seek for Truth, Reason (or whatever they would call it)
> and eventually invent something like MOQ :-)
>
>
> Well, that's what I wanted to tell you and ask your opinion about,
> Mark. If you tell me how this description fits with the MOQ theory and
> what you personally think about it, I would be very grateful.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Ilya
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 07 2004 - 23:07:51 BST