Re: MD DYNAMIC PRESSURE (?)

From: Charles Roghair (ctr@pacificpartssales.com)
Date: Wed Aug 11 2004 - 00:03:52 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "MD Send your money in."

    Johnny:

    The original section of test with the rankings was Ilya's, not mine. I
    simply replaced each DYNAMIC PRESSURE with an AWARENESS to make a
    point. I thought that was obvious; apparently not.

    Is awareness of dynamic pressures not conducive to dynamic change?
    Johnny, left to your devices, man is unessential:

    > I don't think a person needs to be aware of the dynamic presssures
    > around him for dynamic change to take place.

    and looking suspiciously predetermined:

    > That person may read a book tomorrow (because someone gave it to him
    > because it had a cover that had a picture of his favorite car - ie, a
    > seemingly random reason but not without reason) that will put dynamic
    > pressure on him to change his life, and he will change his life.

    Finally:

    > that will put dynamic pressure on him to change his life, and he will
    > change his life.

    What or who is "that?" The Handicapper General?

    Man made God, not the other way around.

    Best regards,

    Chuck

    On Aug 9, 2004, at 4:20 PM, johnny moral wrote:

    > Ilya:
    >>> Now. If a person experiences little DYNAMIC PRESSURE, he is
    >>> dominated completely by static patterns. His life is tepid and
    >>> measured. He may be more or less harmonious depending on how
    >>> coherent his static pattern levels are, but he has comparatively
    >>> little chances to become either mental hospital patient or great
    >>> spiritual leader. He is ordinary very small detail in the body of
    >>> the Giant.
    >
    > I like this idea, because it shows that DQ is better understood as
    > pressure on static patterns by other static patterns. That person may
    > read a book tomorrow (because someone gave it to him because it had a
    > cover that had a picture of his favorite car - ie, a seemingly random
    > reason but not without reason) that will put dynamic pressure on him
    > to change his life, and he will change his life.
    >
    > I don't know why Chuck wants to bring in awareness, or why there is
    > such a strong need to rank people as being better or smarter or more
    > aware or dynamic. OK, people are different in all those ways, but
    > that's entirely because of the dynamically-pressured static patterns
    > that they live in, and those differences may change. I don't think a
    > person needs to be aware of the dynamic presssures around him for
    > dynamic change to take place.
    >
    >
    >
    > Johnny
    >
    >> From: Charles Roghair <ctr@pacificpartssales.com>
    >> Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >> To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >> Subject: Re: MD DYNAMIC PRESSURE (?)
    >> Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:49:39 -0700
    >>
    >> Hello everybody. Hello Ilya.
    >>
    >> Ilya, your new term, DYNAMIC PRESSURE, sounds like AWARENESS to me.
    >>
    >> AWARENESS ¨C n 1: having knowledge of; 2: state of elementary or
    >> undifferentiated consciousness
    >>
    >> Read:
    >>
    >>> AWARENESS is experienced by person drive from static patters of his
    >>> life toward unknown. Experienced by person force that drives him
    >>> toward he does know what, you understand, Mark?
    >>>
    >>> If we use this new term, we don't have to define "AWARENESS" and
    >>> explain what means saying that one person is more aware than
    >>> another. We may just say that a person A experiences much more
    >>> AWARENESS than a person B. Or, that a person A experiences much more
    >>> AWARENESS at the moment of time t1 than he experienced at the
    >>> moment of time t2.
    >>>
    >>> Now. If a person experiences little AWARENESS, he is dominated
    >>> completely by static patterns. His life is tepid and measured. He
    >>> may be more or less harmonious depending on how coherent his static
    >>> pattern levels are, but he has comparatively little chances to
    >>> become either mental hospital patient or great spiritual leader. He
    >>> is ordinary very small detail in the body of the Giant.
    >>>
    >>> If a person experiences great AWARENESS, there are two
    >>> possibilities. If this person's static pattern levels are very
    >>> coherent, his life is a mistic experience of a great intensity.
    >>> Example of such a person - Jesus Christ.
    >>> If this person's static pattern levels are NOT coherent at all, it's
    >>> hard to envy him. His life is complete nighmare. He is being torn
    >>> apart by he doesn't understand what. In such a state some people
    >>> seek rescue at psychoanalysts, some in religion, some in alcohol and
    >>> drugs. Some may clench teeth tight and cling to whatever static
    >>> patterns they had (and thus shut themselves from any possibility for
    >>> growth). Some may stubbornly seek for Truth, Reason (or whatever
    >>> they would call it) and eventually invent something like MOQ :-
    >>>
    >>
    >> As I was enjoy your thoughts on DYNAMIC PRESSURE, I noticed I was
    >> simultaneously aware of AWARENOUS.
    >>
    >> Thoughts?
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Chuck
    >>
    >>
    >> On Aug 7, 2004, at 12:51 PM, §ª§Ý§î§ñ §¬§à§â§à§Ò§Ü§à§Ó wrote:
    >>
    >>> Hi Mark,
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Vac>> 1. Can we say that person A is more Dynamic then person B?
    >>> Vac>> Mark 4-8-04: This can be qualified because a 'person' is given
    >>> quite a
    >>> Vac>> detailed description in the MOQ: A person is dominated by a
    >>> combination of four
    >>> Vac>> levels of evolutionary related static patterns, Inorganic,
    >>> Organic, Social and
    >>> Vac>> Intellectual, and these levels are responding to DQ at the
    >>> same time.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> You know, Mark, something troubles me in this description. It sounds
    >>> too "objective" to me, that is, too far from what a certain human
    >>> being (whatever his metaphysical status is) experiences. Maybe this
    >>> description is all right as long as only phylosophy is concerned,
    >>> but I feel it is not very convenient for psychology.
    >>>
    >>> I invented a new term today, DYNAMIC PRESSURE, and want to present
    >>> it it to you and ask what you think about it.
    >>>
    >>> DYNAMIC PRESSURE is experienced by person drive from static patters
    >>> of his life toward unknown. Experienced by person force that drives
    >>> him toward he does know what, you understand, Mark?
    >>>
    >>> If we use this new term, we don't have to define "DYNAMICNESS" and
    >>> explain what means saying that one person is more Dynamic than
    >>> another. We may just say that a person A experiences much more
    >>> DYNAMIC PRESSURE than a person B. Or, that a person A experiences
    >>> much more DYNAMIC PRESSURE at the moment of time t1 than he
    >>> experienced at the moment of time t2.
    >>>
    >>> Now. If a person experiences little DYNAMIC PRESSURE, he is
    >>> dominated completely by static patterns. His life is tepid and
    >>> measured. He may be more or less harmonious depending on how
    >>> coherent his static pattern levels are, but he has comparatively
    >>> little chances to become either mental hospital patient or great
    >>> spiritual leader. He is ordinary very small detail in the body of
    >>> the Giant.
    >>>
    >>> If a person experiences great DYNAMIC PRESSURE, there are two
    >>> possibilities. If this person's static pattern levels are very
    >>> coherent, his life is a mistic experience of a great intensity.
    >>> Example of such a person - Jesus Christ.
    >>> If this person's static pattern levels are NOT coherent at all, it's
    >>> hard to envy him. His life is complete nighmare. He is being torn
    >>> apart by he doesn't understand what. In such a state some people
    >>> seek rescue at psychoanalysts, some in religion, some in alcohol and
    >>> drugs. Some may clench teeth tight and cling to whatever static
    >>> patterns they had (and thus shut themselves from any possibility for
    >>> growth). Some may stubbornly seek for Truth, Reason (or whatever
    >>> they would call it) and eventually invent something like MOQ :-)
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Well, that's what I wanted to tell you and ask your opinion about,
    >>> Mark. If you tell me how this description fits with the MOQ theory
    >>> and what you personally think about it, I would be very grateful.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Best regards,
    >>> Ilya
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >>> Mail Archives:
    >>> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >>> Nov '02 Onward -
    >>> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >>> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >>>
    >>> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >>> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >>>
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
    > http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 11 2004 - 00:32:55 BST