From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Wed Aug 11 2004 - 20:55:04 BST
Hi Dan,
Dan:
I agree experience can be a tough word to define. What if we say
experience/Dynamic Quality like the Tao is amoral. That's how we get Mark
Maxwell's Tao bombers and reports of Japanese prisoners of war sitting in
zazen while awaiting war crime tribunals.
Mark: Please allow me to make a few points here:
1. Toa bombers are not, 'Maxwell's'. I found references to these and wished
to understand what was meant. I applied the MOQ:
2. The Tao conception of nature is not evolutionary.
3. The MOQ's conception of nature is evolutionary.
We now have a tentative answer to speculation regarding Tao dive bombers:
4. The MOQ provides a moral framework for understanding excellence in action
(Tao dive bombers) within an evolutionary process (Value evolution).
Dan:
There's no need for a mysterious "dark side" of the Tao. It is our own
intellectualization that labels our experience good and evil.
All the best,
Mark
P.S. I wonder if you may be thinking about answering the last post i sent
you? It would be nice to hear what you think.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 11 2004 - 21:09:10 BST