Re: MD Plotinus, Pirsig and Wilber

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sun Aug 15 2004 - 11:47:55 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD Plotinus, Pirsig and Wilber"

    Hi DMB

    All well and very good. But the advantage of
    Pirsig & Wilber and a number of other thinkers is that they
    explain how we have got ourselves embroiled
    in dualistic approaches to existence such
    as SOM. Much PERENNIAL PHILOSOPHY, I've
    read the Huxley, presents an alternative without explaining
    how the division between dualism and non-dualism has
    occurred, how they are related, and how we may get
    back to non-dualism without losing the gains we made on
    the journey through SOM. PERENNIAL PHILOSOPHY
    can seem like going backwards and losing what we have
    gained through SOM rather than a going forward to a new
    form of non-dualism. You can surely see this danger/problem
    with PERENNIAL PHILOSOPHY?

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Buchanan" <DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 1:37 AM
    Subject: MD Plotinus, Pirsig and Wilber

    > Mark and all MOQers:
    >
    > 1. Is Quality more similar to: a. Whitehead's Process Philosophy, b. the
    > Tao, or; c. Plotinus' One?
    >
    > To answer, Dan Glover quoted From Anthony McWatt's MOQ PhD Textbook:
    >
    > "Pirsig asserts that the philosopher closest to him is Plotinus."
    >
    > "I think Pirsig has stated this as both philosophers characterise
    experience
    >
    > as being a continuum from the divine through the intellect to biology then
    > to physical matter (the least divine or lowest Quality level); everything
    is
    >
    > one, for both philosophers, in the sense of being an aspect of God (or to
    > use Pirsig's terminology 'Dynamic Quality')."
    >
    > This idea of a continuum is part of the perennial philosophy...
    >
    > Ken Wilber:
    > "To begin with the premodern or traditional sources, the easiest access to
    > their wisdom is through what has been called the perennial philosophy, or
    > the common core of the world's great spiritual traditions. As Huston
    Smith,
    > Arthur Lovejoy, Ananda Coomaraswamy, and other scholars of these
    traditions
    > have pointed out, the core of the perennial philosophy is the view that
    > reality is composed of various LEVELS OF EXISTENCE - levels of being and
    > knowing - ranging from matter to body to mind to soul to spirit. Each
    senior
    > dimension transcends but includes its juniors, so that this is a
    conception
    > of wholes within wholes within wholes indefinitely, reaching from dirt to
    > divinity." (Emphasis is Wilber's)
    >
    > Mysticism is also a part of the perennial philosophy...
    >
    > Pirsig:
    > 247 "Bradley's fundamental assertion is that the reality of the world is
    > intellectually unknowable, and that defines him as a mystic. ...Both he
    and
    > the MOQ are expressing what Aldous Huxley called "The Perennial
    Philosophy",
    > which is perennial, I believe, because it happens to be true."
    >
    > Or as I like to put it, the evidence is so overwhelming, transcending both
    > history and culture, that we have little choice except to believe it....
    >
    > Wilber:
    > "THE PERENNIAL PHILOSOPHY is the worldview that has been embraced by the
    > vast majority of the world's greatest spiritual teachers, philosophers,
    > thinkers, and even scientists. Its called 'perennial' or 'universal'
    because
    > it shows up in virtually all cultures across the globe and across the
    ages.
    > And wherever we find it, it has essentially similar features, it is in
    > essential agreement the world over. We moderns, who can hardly agree on
    > anything, find this rather hard to believe."
    >
    > Wilber:
    > "THE PERENNIAL PHILOSOPHY (the term was made famous by Huxley but coined
    by
    > Leibniz) - the transcentental essence of the great religions - has as its
    > core the notion of 'nonduality', which means that reality is neither one
    nor
    > many, neither permanent nor dynamic, neither seperate nor unified, neither
    > pluralistic nor holistic. It is entirely and radically above and prior to
    > ANY form of conceptual elaboration. ..Sri Ramana Maharshi had a perfect
    > summary of the paradox of the ultimate:"
    >
    > The world is illusory;
    > Brahman alone is real;
    > Brahman is the world.
    >
    > Am I right in thinking that no explanation is needed. Is it as obvious to
    me
    > as it is to you? Pirsig is very similar to Plotinus and Wilber, no? They
    > have all adopted the perennial philosophy. If we're looking to compare
    > apples with apples, these mystical types are far better suited than almost
    > anything else, no?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > dmb
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 15 2004 - 12:02:19 BST