RE: MD "linear causality"

From: Erin N. (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 22:05:00 GMT

Next message: john williams: "Re: MD No to absolutism"

Previous message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD MOQ and Evidence (from Struan)"
Maybe in reply to: Erin N.: "MD "linear causality""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Scientists can be interested in scope, but I don't think
>we'd want to call Einstein's speculations on God "science."
>
>Matt
>

Probably depends on your conception of God.

"If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded
admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal
it." - Albert Einstein in Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen
Dukas

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: john williams: "Re: MD No to absolutism"
Previous message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD MOQ and Evidence (from Struan)"
Maybe in reply to: Erin N.: "MD "linear causality""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 12 2003 - 21:57:40 GMT