From: Ilya Korobkov (korobkov_ilya@mail.ru)
Date: Tue Aug 17 2004 - 12:18:53 BST
Hi Mark. Hello all.
Some time ago I wrote:
> So we have now two dimensions, two scales, to describe a human. One is
> STATICNESS-DYNAMICNESS (with a "sweet spot" somewhere between the
> extremes) that characterizes adherence of a person to static patterns.
> And another is COHERENCE-INCOHERENCE that characterizes degree of
> dissociation between patterns.
I would put things the other way now. Instead of placing a person
somewhere on the STATICNESS-DYNAMICNESS scale, I would rather
characterize him now as being more or less OPEN TO DYNAMIC QUALITY.
(It is a way of description Wim Nusselder had suggested.) Being open
to DQ means experiencing that your static patterns (or, more corretly,
"static patterns you are composed of") do not adequately reflect DQ.
Consequences of being open to DQ depend on how strongly you cling to
your static patterns. If you cling to them deadly strong it produces
very high DYNAMIC PRESSURE which can make your life insufferable.
But you have very strong, rigid "self", ego.
If, on the contrary, you do not cling to static patterns at all, you
experience no dynamic pressure at all - you just "swim with the
current". BUT YOU ARE NOBODY, you have no self! "Nobody home", as Lila
said.
Is the latter possibility good? Is it of value? I think not. As well
as the former. It seems we should seek for some "sweet spot" between the
extremes.
Vac> Mark 13-8-04: Let us back up a little?
Vac> There are four evolutionary levels in the MOQ description of a person:
...
Vac> All these levels are composed of static patterns of quality responding to DQ.
Vac> Let us take each level at once: Any particular level has a repertoire of
Vac> patterns, and within this repertoire may develop coherent relationships. So,
Vac> coherent relationships may develop in some levels but not in others?
Yes, Mark, I agree. We may speek about coherent relationships within
certain level and may speek about coherent relationships between some
levels, right?
Best regards,
Ilya
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 17 2004 - 12:34:05 BST