RE: MD MOQ and The Problem Of Evil

From: Chuck Roghair (ctr@pacificpartssales.com)
Date: Fri Aug 20 2004 - 21:50:07 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD MOQ and The Problem Of Evil"

    David:

    Please, if you're going to accuse me of "entirely losing sight with
    reality," back it up with at least one example.

    My conception of God is that he is man-made. A product of mythology, a
    relic left-over from history, an excuse to bomb abortion clinics and fly
    airplanes into buildings. "God" is "liberty" and "freedom" and "the
    American Way" and "Jihad." Just and empty word that people have been
    brainwashed into feeling some passion for, unfortunately, enough passion to
    kill and be killed over and over again.

    I'm working within the natural universe here. I see no reason to look
    beyond that reality to a supernatural, omnipotent, infallible, omnipresent,
    ultimately benevolent creator fully equipped with x-ray vision and laser
    beams mounted on his head to answer to life's questions. Common sense
    demands that God doesn't exist. You've certainly provided no evidence to
    the contrary.

    One could make a far more cohesive, sound argument for the existence of
    Santa Clause. A lot like God actually: both incredibly old dudes with long
    white beards and questionable fashion; each keeps a running list of the
    naughty and nice to be assigned Hell-fire and lumps of coal, or Heaven and
    colorful plastic noisy landfill in an orgy of consumerism come judgment day,
    respectively. They're surrounded by flying reindeer, harp-strumming angels
    and toy-making elf-midgets; sometimes, I forget who is whom.

    At least come December I can go over to the local mall and shake Santa's
    hand, though.

    Best regards,

    Chuck

     
    A good traveler has no fixed plans and is not intent upon arriving. A good
    artist lets his intuition lead him wherever it wants.
    -Lao Zi

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]
    On Behalf Of David Morey
    Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 11:42 AM
    To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    Subject: Re: MD MOQ and The Problem Of Evil

    Hi Chuck

    I think this conception of god is completely off track.
    You have an abstract and clearly wrong conception of god and try to
    square it with reality and then condemn such an abstract god.
    For me you are entirely losing sight of reality and the difficulties
    and necessities so clearly involved in the reality we share.

    So your conception is wrong. Why not start with understanding
    reality and then work your way to what the ultimate category
    called god may be like. I suggest the MOQ as a good approach
    to reality. Reality is full of SQ. What is SQ, it is repetition. SQ
    makes reality possible, it is the bases of thingness but also selfness.
    SQ is the exact opposite of divinity, it is repetition, it is limitation,
    it is lack of choice, it is non-openness, and the Same again.
    SQ tends towards eternal recurrence. Could a divinity intervene,
    maybe it could, but to do so would be to tear up the basis of this reality,
    to go back on earlier decisions, e.g. to go for carbon based life
    forms, matter and not anti-matter, etc. Our god is really a god of DQ
    that leaves SQ in its wake. Being a certain sort of god DQ creates SQ
    by sticking to its decisions/commitments, pretty god-like. So rocks
    keep crushing things in the way rocks were always meant to. And
    radiation messes up genes because radiation keeps on being radiation.
    Our god is at least consistent. Decisions are made and stuck to.
    But far from being boring our god just can't help pouring forth with her
    creativity, embellishing reality with more and more impressive SQ.
    Sit back and enjoy, the real mccoy.......

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Chuck Roghair" <ctr@pacificpartssales.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:46 PM
    Subject: RE: MD MOQ and The Problem Of Evil

    > Mel, All:
    >
    > Consider a baby born in the 19th century with Down Syndrome. Babies with
    > Down Syndrome are sometimes born with intestinal blockages. Said
    blockages
    > are easily cleared today via a simple operation.
    >
    > In the 19th century, the Down syndrome baby dies an excruciating death
    over
    > a period of several days from dehydration and infection.
    >
    > What perfect creator creates this? For what purpose?
    >
    > Back to the Down Syndrome baby with intestinal blockage: her birthday is
    > today. There is a surgeon nearby with the aptitude and facilities to ease
    > the baby's suffering and allow her a long-term relatively happy life.
    > Imagine he refuses to operate for no apparent reason. He simply isn't in
    > the mood. Virtually everyone would agree he's a cretin, morally
    > reprehensible. He could easily save the baby's life with little effort at
    > little cost to anyone, he simply doesn't feel like it.
    >
    > That's God.
    >
    > Best regards,
    >
    > Chuck
    >
    >
    > A good traveler has no fixed plans and is not intent upon arriving. A good
    > artist lets his intuition lead him wherever it wants.
    > -Lao Zi
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]
    > On Behalf Of ml
    > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 8:59 AM
    > To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    > Subject: Re: MD MOQ and The Problem Of Evil
    >
    > MSH and Johnny:
    > (interleaved)
    >
    > msh:
    > > It's not death that is the problem. It's suffering. A benevolent,
    > > omnipotent, omniscient god could keep the laws of gravity in place,
    > > let the rock fall and the child die swiftly and painlessly.
    >
    > mel:
    > Why do you assume that a swift painless death is a superior one?
    > We may fear pain, but can you be sure there is no possibility of
    > something to be gained from the experience of it?
    >
    > msh:
    > > The POE occurs when the rock falls and crushes the child's
    > > legs and spine, so that she lies there in agony for hours till
    > > comes the wolf to finish her off.
    >
    > mel:
    > Severe traumatic injury typically involves little actual pain, but
    > rather an intriguing wierdness or inappropriateness, it is the
    > recovery from injury that is painful. My own shoulder dislocations,
    > broken bones, snapped tendons and ligaments, when I actually
    > "reached into" the experience and FELT what was there were
    > both odd and interesting. It was the mind's insistence on what
    > my body SHOULD be that was the cause of any horror or pain.
    > I cause my perception of suffering, my nervous system simply
    > relayed the sensation. The sensations were not pleasant,
    > compared to eating chocolate or having sex, but the aespect
    > called suffering came from the mind, before I realized I could
    > reach past that 'illusion' in that experience,
    > (those experiences).
    >
    > Upon reflection, the POE is our attempt to project upon the
    > infinite our preferences for how things from our limited capacity
    > ought to be. That is simple absurdity, regardless of the
    > rigorousness of formulation or the structure of the argument.
    > (Deciding that the world was flat is the same type of projection,
    > except in West Texas - where it REALLY is.)
    >
    > As for the wolf, it is grateful to eat.
    >
    > msh:
    > > Trust me. It's the knock-out punch.
    >
    > mel:
    > Since we are only shadow boxing, there is no knock-out punch
    > beyond the fantasy of our own ego.
    >
    > thanks--mel
    >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 20 2004 - 22:21:24 BST