RE: MD Pirsig a liberal?

From: Kevin (kevin@xap.com)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 22:04:20 GMT

  • Next message: Kevin: "RE: MD MOQ and Evidence (from Struan)"

    Platt and DMB quoted Pirsig:
    "That's what neither the socialist NOR the capitalists ever got figured
    out.
    From a static point of view socialism is more moral than capitalism. Its
    a
    higher form of evolution. Its an intellectually guided society, not just
    a society that is guided by mindless traditons. That's what gives
    socialism its drive. But what the socialist left out and what has all
    but killed their whole undertaking is an absence of a concept of
    indefinite DQ. You go to a socialist city and it's always a dull place
    because there's little DQ. On the other hand the conservatives who keep
    trumpeting about the virtues of free enterprise are normally just
    supporting their own self-interest. They are just doing the usual
    cover-up fro the rich in their age-old explotation of the poor. Some of
    them seem to sense there is also something mysteriously virtuous in a
    free enterprise system and you can see them stuggling to put it into
    words but they don't have the metaphysical vocabulary for it any more
    than the socialists do."

    Kevin:
    It's interesting that this quote is being shoe-horned into an argument
    for each side.

    This quote is interesting but leaves me with questions.

    If socialism is "more moral" and "more evolved" than why is it dying
    out, according to Pirsig? He seems to suggest that it lacks DQ. How can
    it lack DQ and be "more moral" at the same time? Something doesn't quite
    jive with that.

    Maybe Pirsig is making a distinction between the Theories and the
    Systems involved? The IDEA of the Left is more moral, but historically
    the socialists (and I assume he means the Hard Left not just Social
    Democrats like most of western europe) failed to implement actual
    Systems that made good on these high ideas without resorting to regimes
    devoid of DQ. Is that the point?

    Or is he saying that in practice, a low-moral idea that allows for DQ
    (capitalism) is superior to a high-moral idea that doesn't? Or has
    practice nothing to do with it and even in theory this is the case?

    -Kevin

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 13 2003 - 22:04:35 GMT