Re: MD Plotinus, Pirsig and Wilber

From: Scott Roberts (jse885@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Aug 21 2004 - 22:51:51 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Plotinus, Pirsig and Wilber"

    David M,

    > But I also agree with Scott that there is something idea-intellect
    > like about all the activity/creativity that occurs in the cosmos prior
    > to 4th level intellect in Pirsig's terms. So Pirsig fails to nail
    > this aspect of intelligence in all of cosmic creativity, i.e. pre-human
    > intellect even. I in fact think this helps my case for feeling that the
    > realm of DQ possibilities -sort of dreams and ideas- is prior to
    > SQ actuality. What we mean by SQ Being is the very thingness-repetition
    > that gives it duration-being-pattern-sameness. I cannot imagine SQ before
    > DQ, but I can imagine a dream-time of pure DQ without SQ, where there is
    > pure flux, no repetition, where all bursts of activity is new and
    therefore
    > pure flux.

    I can't imagine it, since there can be no activity without something (SQ)
    to act against, to provide a background. Flux can't happen without
    something to change. You can't notice that you are not stepping into the
    same river without something repeating. Hence I see the requirement of the
    logic of polarity.

    > Only the cessation of DQ, the plunge into repetition can bring about
    reality
    > as we know it. And this plunge is the first differentiation. DQ plunges
    into
    > repetition, SQ gains some kind of autonomy and separation from DQ,
    > it is free to repeat, free of change and creativity, DQ forsakes power
    > over the realm of SQ, only in this self-alienation of Quality into SQ/DQ
    > is it possible to open the space where there can be awareness and a
    content
    > of that awareness, an Other, with its own duration-being, as if DQ drew
    > an image of its self in the sand and called it a reflection, prior to the
    SQ
    > line drawing there was no Other to experience, separation is the mother of
    > experience. SQ is the self-expression of DQ to itself!

    Rather, I see DQ/SQ polarity as the self-expression of Quality to itself.

    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 21 2004 - 23:12:37 BST