Re: MD and the LIE DETECTOR test

From: ml (mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Tue Sep 07 2004 - 20:15:30 BST

  • Next message: MarshaV: "MD Zmm, Lila & Barnes&Noble"

    Scott,

    Thanks! As a practical matter my father
    used to tell me that anyone who starts
    a relationship by calling you untrustworthy
    and a liar is pretty much telegraphing the
    fact that they themselves are.

    This is one piece of 'worldy advice' I've
    not found him to be wrong on yet.

    thanks--mel

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Scott Roberts" <jse885@earthlink.net>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 12:05 PM
    Subject: RE: MD and the LIE DETECTOR test

    > Mel,
    >
    > Since I am a nervous sort of person, I've never been able to imagine
    > passing one, even without lying, so I too have always been bothered. It
    > could be that they can take this into account, but I'm not inclined to
    > trust them.
    >
    > My view is that if employers requires a lie detector test, or a urinalysis
    > for that matter, then it is immoral to sign up with them, as well as it
    > being immoral for them to require the test. Pretty much for reason (2),
    the
    > Giant dominating the individual.
    >
    > - Scott
    >
    >
    > > [Original Message]
    > > From: ml <mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com>
    > > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > > Date: 9/7/2004 12:12:42 PM
    > > Subject: MD and the LIE DETECTOR test
    > >
    > > All:
    > >
    > > What is the morality of a lie detector test as
    > > a pre-employment test?
    > >
    > > It seems to me, for questions concerning your
    > > opinions and personal views, to be:
    > > 1) a physical level device placed in 'judgement'
    > > over a biological being.
    > > 2) a social level attempt at dominating the
    > > intellectual function of a person.
    > >
    > > The very existence of the "test" bothered me
    > > when I first heard of it at age five. Seemed that it
    > > was somehow wrong, not unlike the feeling I
    > > had at learning about the guilliotine or the rack.
    > >
    > > thanks--mel
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 07 2004 - 20:42:01 BST