Re: MD A bit of reasoning

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Sep 07 2004 - 20:57:45 BST

  • Next message: ml: "Re: MD Zmm, Lila & Barnes&Noble"

    Hi Scott,

    I like it, but have some suggestions. You omitted a key component--an
    individual PERSON who does the thinking and responding to DQ. (See inserts
    in caps to your reasoning.) Also, I've changed No. 4 because you
    inadvertently repeated "static intellectual patterns of value," creating a
    contradiction, and I eliminated the idea that "thought grows plants"
    because thought as Pirsig defines it (collection and manipulation of
    symbols) is limited to humans. (Plants can't read Lila.) Finally, I
    reached a different conclusion.

    > 1. Are static patterns of value universals or particulars? Answer: They
    > must be universals, as implied by the word "pattern". A particular, once it
    > exists, cannot be changed. Only the rules for producing particulars can be
    > changed, and so it is only as universals that there is value for the
    > present and future (the particular does serve to exemplify the universal,
    > however) .
     
    > 2. DQ, the creative force, works with existing SQ to produce new SQ.
    > (MOQ thesis).
     
    > 3. The word for working with universals to produce new universals is
    > intellect, as it is a matter of an PERSON evaluating existing universals
    > (concepts, rules) by imagining the consequences of choosing among
    > possibilities, and making the choice.
     
    > 4. Therefore, DQ is intellect-in-use by a PERSON responding to DQ, and
    > all SQ are static intellectual patterns of value (which may be
    > subdivided into inorganic, biological, social, and intellectual
    > patterns.

    > 5. Therefore, "Quality" as used in the MOQ is a static intellectual
    > pattern (symbol) created by a PERSON (Pirsig) responding to DQ. Although
    > Quality, the symbol, is a static pattern, as a phenomenon it can't be
    > confined to a pattern of any kind.
     
    Have a missed the point of your reasoning? Perhaps your original text
    about "thought growing plants" is key to your whole approach, i.e., the
    universe is one big thought.

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 07 2004 - 21:28:22 BST