From: Scott Roberts (jse885@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Oct 13 2004 - 15:30:47 BST
Ian,
.
> Why bother ?
> In order to have a means of understanding, explaining and predicting, and
> hopefully influencing outcomes.
> (I'm no defender of science or materialism, in the real world.)
Why bother adding the mechanistic aspect to it, is what I mean. Selection,
yes, is a help to understanding: those SQ that don't work well die out. But
chance, no, other than the sense that we don't know all that is involved in
producing new SQ.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 13 2004 - 15:34:17 BST