Re: MD On Faith

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Oct 18 2004 - 21:17:53 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD On Faith"

    Ian:

    > There are a zillion options between "pre-ordained life" and "accidental
    > sentient meat", and I'me getting very tired of this being treated as a
    > binary debate, even in jest.

    I'm tired of Darwinian acolytes who presuppose they have the one right
    explanation for how we got here, especially since Darwin's theory is not
    reproducible and thus not provable (or falsifiable) by science's own
    standards of proof. Just as science cannot explain how neural activity
    produces consciousness, it cannot explain how the complexity of bacteria
    could have been formed by accident. But, there's really no point in
    arguing the pros and cons of Darwinian theory on this forum. There are
    plenty of other places for that. What we ought to be discussing is
    Pirsig's evolutionary theory based on a transcendent moral force.

    Besides, Americans consider it wholesome sport to mock arrogance. :-)

    Platt
          

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 05:17:23 BST