From: MarshaV (marshalz@i-2000.com)
Date: Sun Oct 24 2004 - 17:48:50 BST
Having read the two websites concerning synchronicity, I'll stick with my
first reaction. The term synchronicity is whatever definition you give it
within the bounds of the culture. The synchronic event exists if you
choose to believe it does. The event does seem to be more dependent on
one's personal psychology. It's a mental link between ideas. How could
you prove it one way or the other? I would guess that a Buddhist would
think it illusion. Maya. But I don't know. Yet, I have played with the
idea of synchronicity, and it was fun, play.
A brave man once requested me
to answer questions that are key
is it to be or not to be
and I replied 'oh why ask me?'
MarshaV
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 24 2004 - 18:16:44 BST