RE: MD On Faith

From: Chuck Roghair (ctr@pacificpartssales.com)
Date: Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:32:54 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD On Faith"
  • Next message: Simon Magson: "Re: MD On Faith"

    Fair enough.

     

      _____

    From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]
    On Behalf Of Erin
    Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 6:19 AM
    To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    Subject: Re: MD On Faith

     

    Chuck,

    This is the second time you abuse or maybe the better word is misuse the
    word mu.

    Maybe somebody has the inablity to understand something because you have no
    ability to answer a question. You can "mu" all you want, but from here I
    don't have any confidence you understand anything because all you do is mu,
    mu and never answer anything I ask. So you can keep your two cents for
    others questions because your "answers"never really help my understanding.

        

    Erin

    Charles Roghair <ctr@pacificpartssales.com> wrote:

    Hello mel, Erin, Everybody,

    If you don't mind my two cents:

    On Oct 25, 2004, at 6:29 PM, Erin wrote:

    > Hi,
    > I am not trying to give you a hard time mel. I am just truly
    > confused at how you distinguish these things. I'm getting dizzy
    > trying to figure out what the heck your argument is.....remind me why
    > you justify your belief in MOQ is not faith with the claim that it
    > falls as RATIONAL empiricism and then with this new statement shun
    > rational label as SOM and seemingly start to describe a realm of
    > beyond understanding which was how you described faith.
    >
    > Erin

    Chuck's take:

    Faith in the MoQ is convenient and, as opposed to inconvenient faith in
    God, is not faith in the supernatural. The supernat! ural is
    non-existent as far as the MoQ is concerned; there's no place for it.

    The MoQ is is beyond understanding in as much as any metaphysics is
    beyond understanding and if you can't understand that you have little
    hope of understanding the MoQ.

    Or, more succinctly, mu.

    Best regards,

    Chuck

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:56:02 BST