From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Sun Oct 31 2004 - 11:14:46 GMT
Hi,
A brief butting in on this thread:
>
> The ultimate ONE sounds God-like to me.
>
> msh says:
> Yes. Similar, I'd say, but without all those troublesome human
> projections: Not loving or caring, but not hateful either, or
> cunning or vengeful; without expectations or desire; without
> opinions: no favored people or nations or baseball teams. Nothing to
> kill or die for.
Does quality value? In other words, does Quality have preferences? I just have a suspicion that
something crucial gets lost if we say no. What does it mean to say that a valuation which we make (a
phrase that needs unpacking and clarifying itself) - what does it mean to say that a valuation which
we make is a discernment of Quality, or a response to Quality, or however we want to describe it? Is
Quality inert? Is it just a linguistic abstraction? Or does it 'lure' higher patterns of value up
from the lower? Because if the latter is true - which is how I've always tended to understand it,
although it may well not be how RMP understands it - if the latter is true then those 'troublesome
human projections' might just have a coat peg on which to be hung.
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 31 2004 - 11:36:46 GMT