RE: MD On Faith

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Oct 31 2004 - 19:46:01 GMT

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD On Faith"

    From: Erin : I went and searched through the definitions of emprical. I do
    finally understand why you are using it. Although I finally understand why
    you use it, I don't plan on using it. To me the word emprical is more
    associated with the scientific field and my understanding it stems from how
    they use the word. The philosophical way of using it is just too different
    for me that it doesn't really seem like the same word to me anymore, and
    just seems to confuse things for me. (I don't put science above philosophy,
    it is just that term I associated with how science uses it)

    I am not sure why but this all seems like an "apology" that Quality is not
    empirical (in the scientific sense), although I know that is not a fair
    because no field "owns" a word so you don't have to tell me why it is not.
    I do apologize for not doing a thorough search of this word earlier. I do
    believe, but may be wrong, that how you use it not as well known.
     
    dmb says:
    Maybe somebody can help becasue I don't recall where it comes from, but I
    think Pirsig said the MOQ accepts the scientific principle which says, "that
    which cannot be distinguished from anythng else does not exist" and adds
    that value is the same way. It says "that which is not valued is not
    distinguishable from anything else". This is how value becomes the source of
    all distinctions, this is better than that a gazillion times until patterns
    are built up to become the world of distinquishable things, empirical
    things. The world is built of these distinctions, these values so that we
    get a radical, expanded empriicism. And these "contsructions" are sort of
    epistemology and ontology at the same time. We are created by these patterns
    of likes and dislikes, in some sense, and yet these patterns of distinctions
    are still considered to be as real as rocks and trees.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries -

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 31 2004 - 19:58:45 GMT