RE: MD Moral values in the election

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Nov 07 2004 - 02:57:32 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Moral values in the election and in the Bible"

    Arlo and all MOQers:

    Arlo said:
    What Platt misses, and what has been repeatedly argued, is that this was
    not a victory of "social over biological", it was a victory of "social over
    intellectual". Even if one accepts the skewed belief that the only thing
    the "hippies of the 60's" fought for was sexual promiscuity, todays'
    liberals are the ones who brought civil equality, women's rights, fair
    wages for labor, workers' compensation, and the rights of individuals...

    dmb says:
    I think Arlo is reading it right. Ten of eleven states passed a ban on gay
    marriage. The Republicans in Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to
    do the same during this campaign season and mail was sent out to voters
    warning them that liberals were going to ban the bible and allow gay
    marriage. The conservatives see it as a triumph of morals over vice, but
    from an intellecual perspective, it is a denial of equal protection under
    the law, a denial of the rights of a certain class of citizens and as such
    is illegal and immoral. From that perspective its a case of traditional
    values in conflict with intellectual values. The conservatives THINK they
    are putting "morals" over "sin", but they're actually putting religious
    beliefs over individual rights.

    Its interesting that the kind of vice, or social pathology if you prefer,
    that the right is most concerned with also happens to be the kind of social
    pathology that most affects conservatives. Haven't you ever noticed how its
    the self-righteous moralizers who end up being exposed for some such vice?
    Bill Bennett and gambling, Jim Baker and sex, Bill O'Reily and sex, Rush
    Limbaugh and drugs. Its is real pattern in the larger society, not just
    anecdotal evidence from celebrities. It only makes sense. Why would such
    moral issues be of concern if they weren't grappeling with already. That's
    what makes them resonate with such urgency for some and why it seems so
    real. And I suppose that an intellectually oriented person has more or less
    learned to manage such issues. Let's call it self possession, one who is not
    ruled by the body's appitites or desires.

    But its more than that. Not only are there a whole host of similarly
    confused beliefs on the part of the "morals" crowd, it also goes hand in
    hand with othe social level attitudes about the world. In the larger
    picture, the present conservative ideology also includes a kind of
    belligerant nationalism, an intolerance of dissent, a penchant for secrecy,
    a unilateral militarism that is contemptuous of international law and
    international agreements and some other elements that scare the living shit
    out of me. I think we are looking down the barrel of some kind of
    Christo-fascism. And now he thinks he has a mandate. Oh God, please save us
    from the christians!

    Arlo added:
    As Sidney Blumenthal, a leftist response to the likes of the rightists
    Limbaugh et al, writes in the Salon, "[t]he evangelical churches became
    instruments of political organization. Ideology was enforced as theology,
    turning nonconformity into sin, and the faithful, following voter guides
    with biblical literalism, were shepherded to the polls as though to the
    rapture", as continues "[t]hese emotions were linked to what is
    euphemistically called "moral values," which is actually social and sexual
    panic over the rights of women and gender roles... Only imposing manly
    authority against "girlie men," girls and lurking terrorists can save the
    nation.". Finally, "They grafted imperial unilateralism onto provincial
    isolationism. Fear of the rest of the world was to be mastered with
    contempt for it."

    dmb says:
    I think Pirsig's descriptions of the battle between social and intellectal
    values tells us exactly what's behind all this conflict and division. It
    also explains why each side utter fails to comprehend the other. The real
    world is very complex and full of shades, but basically we're talking about
    two groups of people who basically live in different realities, or as Pirsig
    has it, two different levels of reality. The conservatives think liberals
    have no morals and liberal think conservatives have no brains. Its a kind of
    civil war.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 07 2004 - 03:11:59 GMT