Re: MD On Transcendence

From: hampday@earthlink.net
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 05:26:15 GMT

  • Next message: Erin: "Re: MD Moral values in the election and in the Bible"

    Ham Priday to Scott Roberts
    Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:25 PM
    Subject: RE: MD On Transcendence

    > [Scott:] Pirsig says (Lila, Ch. 5):
    > "What the Metaphysics of Quality would do is take this separate category,
    > Quality, and show how it contains subjects and objects. The Metaphysics of
    > Quality would show how things become enormously more coherent --
    > *fabulously* more coherent -- when you start with an assumption that
    > Quality is the primary empirical reality of the world."
    >
    > So, strictly speaking, there could be some non-empirical Who-Knows-What
    > prior to Quality, but since Pirsig wishes to stick to an empirical
    > metaphysics, his position is that Quality is as deep as one can go. To ask
    > if it is "pre-conditional, transcendent, and uncreated" is to add a bunch
    > of empirically unanswerable, and unnecessary, questions. (I am trying to
    > stick to Pirsig's view. Mine is somewhat different, but that is neither
    > here nor there.)
    >
    > So if you say that a metaphysics must determine that which is
    > pre-conditional, transcendental, uncreated, etc., I imagine that Pirsig
    > would reply that that is a metaphysical criterion that he doesn't share.
    > That is, yours and his are different metaphysics, that to claim that his
    is
    > not metaphysics comes about by your defining metaphysics the way you do.
    >
    Scott, thank you for a very lucid and complete answer to my question. It is
    consistent with what I have read of Pirsig, and it describes an
    intellectually fascinating philosophy that is unique in its interpretation
    of evolutionary process.

    That said, I stand by my belief that the MOQ, at least insofar as it has
    been developed in Pirsig's books, is deficient as a moral guide for mankind
    and inadequate as a metaphysical thesis. This is not to say that you guys
    aren't capable of correcting the deficiencies, perhaps even expanding the
    author's theory into a philosophy that will be as meaningful for those
    outside of this discussion group. I hope I live long enough to see the the
    fruit of your labors.

    Regards,
    Ham
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 10 2004 - 08:45:46 GMT