From: Magnus Berg (McMagnus@home.se)
Date: Fri Jan 24 2003 - 16:07:05 GMT
Hi Dan and Willy
Dan wrote:
>In my opinion, like Dynamic Quality, love cannot be defined, so there is
>little use in analyzing it. Love just is.
I mostly agree with Dan here. Love cannot be defined, so it does look like DQ to us. However, my own little pet theory is that it is a fifth level. It fits rather well with Pirsig's description of a level:
"The higher level can often be seen to be in opposition to the lower level, dominating it, controlling it where possible for its own purposes."
Anybody recognize love in opposition to intellect? Expressions such as irrational are often used when an attempt is made to intellectualise behaviour of people in love. But at the same time it is often also described as some higher kind of good, i.e. a higher level.
But of course, it could also simply be DQ, we have no way of intellectually knowing.
Magnus
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 24 2003 - 16:07:58 GMT