From: PhaedrusWolf@aol.com
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 18:48:39 GMT
In a message dated 11/21/04 12:34:21 AM Eastern Standard Time,
markheyman@infoproconsulting.com writes:
Just a quick note. You haven't lost me! Sometimes it takes a while
to respond, or sometimes no response is made because I don't see
enough to disagree with, and I have other fish to fry. This is not
personal, and doesn't mean I haven't read what you've written.
The best way to keep me engaged is, if you disagree with what I've
said, quote me EXACTLY and in context, and take me to task on that
particular point.
When you write long posts that make sort of general points with which
I more or less agree, but don't disagree enough to get bunged up, I'm
not likely to respond.
Hi msh,
I really thought; "Good as a noun rather than an adjective is all
Metaphysics of Quality is all about." might have been enough to get you "bunged up."
Or maybe;
"My personal feeling is that this is how any further improvement of the
world will be done: by individuals making Quality decisions and that's all."
Don't worry, I don't take things personally. I just like to end a
conversation with agreement, or the idea that there is no way to resolve our
differences of opinion.
I'll leave it at that to try to keep my response short.
Thanks for the reply,
Chin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 21 2004 - 21:10:15 GMT