Re: MD Self

From: PhaedrusWolf@aol.com
Date: Sun Nov 28 2004 - 01:49:47 GMT

  • Next message: PhaedrusWolf@aol.com: "Re: MD People and Value in the MOQ"

     
    In a message dated 11/27/04 6:37:26 PM Eastern Standard Time,
    mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com writes:

    Using these as High Static Quality "walls"
    to aim at the "place" of Dynamic Quality
    being is useful.

    Hi mel,
     
    May I ask that you expound (maybe on fifth grade terms :o))
     
    I agree with;
     
    "The following of either definition has advantage and
    tradition-based disadvantage, it seems. However,
    insisting on either IS a wall, a barrier."
     
    It seems to me that the idea behind MOQ is to remove this wall or barrier.
    Seems to me I read somewhere Pirsig felt he had reached about 1% completeness
    in this. The other 99% is up to us(?)
     
    I believe he follows the philosophy of William James, to an extent. I can't
    quote, but do remember reading James offering the idea (prediction) of these
    walls tumbling down as we became a more diverse population. Both Pirsig and
    James were ahead of their time.
     
    I would like to read more of your thoughts on this if you don't mind.
     
    Thanks,
     
    Chin

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 28 2004 - 02:04:44 GMT