From: Scott Roberts (jse885@earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Nov 28 2004 - 15:55:11 GMT
David M,
> DM: Is this problematic because you are talking about that moment
> when DQ allows SQ to emerge into material/actualised reality. Where
> there is an active moment of choice, where from an abundance of potential
> (immaterial unrealised potential) something static and material and
> sungulaer
> emerges. Only then has something without contrast allowed something in
> contrast and Other to it to emerge?
Well, I don't grant the language "DQ allows SQ to emerge", as it leads to
reifying DQ and SQ, but nevermind. It is problematic insofar as one tries
to visualize it or think it in static concepts. It becomes a solution when
one moves it from being something visualizable or thinkable to the status
of visualizing, or thinking. Things don't exist by being in balance between
contradictory identities, but by being out of balance while trying to get
into balance.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 28 2004 - 16:20:48 GMT