RE: MD New Level of Thinking

From: Scott Roberts (jse885@earthlink.net)
Date: Mon Nov 29 2004 - 16:03:57 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "RE: MD New Level of Thinking"

    Platt,

    > > > Godel showed it as being contradictory in proving there's no such
    thing
    > > >as proof.
    > >
    > > Well, no. It proves that there exist arithmetical statements that are
    true
    > > but unprovable, which means that arithmetic is incomplete.
    >
    > "It proves . . .unprovable" was my point.

    There is an enormous difference between saying that a particular statement
    is unprovable, and saying that there's no such thing as proof. Would you
    say that because there is one mountain that is over 29000 feet in altitude,
    therefore all mountains are?
     
    >
    > > But he falls off the Middle Way when he says: "the mystical goal is to
    > > experience pure DQ by putting all SQ to sleep". [Ch. 30] My position is
    > > that there is no "pure DQ".
    >
    > Is that a verbatim quote? I can't find it. Anyway, he simply means to
    have a
    > mystic experience requires stopping one's internal chattering intellect
    for
    > awhile.
    >

    Sorry, this was my rephrasing of two quotes (from Ch. 30): "This solution
    [to insanity] is to dissolve *all* static patterns, both sane and insane,
    and find the base of reality, Dynamic Quality, that is independent of all
    of them." and a few pages later, in reference to Zen practice, "You free
    yourself from static patterns by putting them to sleep."

    > I don't see where he views intellect as negative. He enjoys doing
    > metaphysics.

    It's treated negatively in relation to DQ, as in the hot stove example, or
    in Ch, 29: "James had condensed this description to a single sentence:
    "There must always be a discrepancy between concepts and reality, because
    the former are static and discontinuous while the latter is dynamic and
    flowing." Here James had chosen exactly the same words Phaedrus had used
    for the basic subdivision of the [MOQ]."

    Note that James has distinguished concepts from reality, with no objection
    from Phaedrus.

    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 29 2004 - 16:20:51 GMT