From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Dec 04 2004 - 20:39:43 GMT
Erin:
> Thank you. I thought I had clearly distinguished the two but then your
> last statement threw me back into confusion, almost seems like it is
> saying that contextualism is MORE relative, if the context is more narrow
Then ignore my last statement. Wouldn't be the first time that my feeble
attempt to clarify only caused more confusion.
Incidentally, you answered my question to Ham about why everyone shrinks
from the concept of absolutes by referring to the statement, "We're truly
certain there is no true certainty." The statement is illogical because it
contradicts itself. Philosophy ought to be logically consistent based on
non-selfcontradictory assumptions. Otherwise, it's flaky.
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 04 2004 - 20:37:45 GMT