Re: MD Is the MoQ still in the Kantosphere?

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Mon Dec 27 2004 - 17:02:15 GMT

  • Next message: RycheWorld@aol.com: "Re: MD Dynamic/static morality"

    Hi Sam,

    Just a quick response...

    On 27 Dec 2004 at 11:32, Sam Norton wrote:

    In other words, when we use the word 'experience' we tend to still
    use it in a SOMish way. My suspicion - growing stronger all the time -
    is that Pirsig doesn't escape this problem, and the metaphysical
    apparatus that he set up in Lila is still conditioned by the
    Cartesian/Kantian framework. But I'll spell all that out in longer
    form. This was just a taster :-)

    msh says:
    Well, feel free to spell it out but you'll be pushing an open door
    (or, in your case, preaching to the choir), at least if it's me you
    are trying to convince.

    I think that anyone who formulates a thought is stuck with SOM,
    whether they like it or not, most obviously when they try to express
    that thought to someone else. I think that everyone will from time
    to time have pre-intellectual (mystical) glimpses of the reality
    behind the veil, and that there may be ways to instigate and even
    prolong such experiences (thus my interest Mysticism 101); but,
    eventually, we must "return to the market place." It's either that
    or non-functional insanity, sitting alone on the floor in a room, and
    letting cigarettes burn down into our fingers.

    In my last post to the "Is Morality Relative?" thread, I questioned
    what Pirsig might mean by saying that a continuous "flood" of sense
    data is coming our way, too much for us to process meaningfully.
    This is where he says DQ preselects (or filters or creates?) VALUABLE
    data for our enjoyment. This to me is problematic. If DQ preselects
    then it must be selecting some data from the stream and ignoring
    others. So what's the source of the stream? If DQ doesn't select
    from the stream but rather "creates" the data, then it's fair to ask
    if DQ is private or public. If public, then there is something OUT
    THERE. If private, then we are stuck with solipsism.

    Anyway, it will be interesting to see what others have to say about
    this, either here, or in response to the "Is Morality Relative?"
    thread.

    Later,
    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    "The shadows that a swinging lamp will throw,
    	We come from nowhere and to nothing go."
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 27 2004 - 17:29:07 GMT