From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Jan 03 2005 - 13:54:38 GMT
Hi Paul,
> Platt said:
> Put it any way you wish, but how do you explain mathematical laws are a
> good approximation of what some of it (reality) tends to do? Just a
> coincidence, i.e., that (some) static value patterns just happen for no
> reason at all to fall into intelligible mathematical patterns?
>
> Paul:
> I'm sorry Platt but I don't get it. Are you saying that inorganic
> patterns are guided by mathematics? I think inorganic patterns are
> guided by preferences for certain relationships and mathematics is a
> good way of modelling those preferences.
I'm sorry for not making my question clear. First, I am not saying
inorganic patterns are guided by mathematics. Second, I agree that
inorganic patterns are guided by preferences for certain relationships. My
question is, how do you explain that mathematics, a creation of human
intellect, is able to so accurately model those preferences? Is it simply
a mystery, or is there rationale for the relationship between inorganic
preferences and mathematical formulas? To me it appears to be a
relationship of cosmic and human intelligence that I know you reject. So
I'm asking for your alternative explanation.
Regards,
Platt
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 12/30/04 MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archives: Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 03 2005 - 20:39:40 GMT