From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jan 04 2005 - 13:53:45 GMT
Hi MSH,
Thanks for explaining the connection between "imaginary numbers" and
"empirical reality." A most interesting explication. You concluded:
> Anyway, here endeth the lecture. Sorry. But this is pretty amazing
> stuff, really, and it's not so hard to see why some mathematicians
> might feel that God is to be found in the beauty and perfection of
> mathematics. IMO, he very fact that math is NOT phenomenal in nature
> is why it's a serious contender for getting a glimpse at the
> "underlying reality" of the cosmos, if there is such a thing. And,
> though it may be true that "there is nothing out there" you can
> understand why mathematicians and scientists have a hard time with
> the "reality is an illusion" syndrome.
Precisely my sense of amazement and wonderment, too, expressed much better
than I could. I have yet to hear an MOQ explanation of why "value
preferences" at the physical level are expressible in mathematical terms.
"Well, that's just the way it is" hardly counts as a answer.
Regards,
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 04 2005 - 15:25:08 GMT