Re: MD Universal Moral Standards

From: Phaedrus Wolff (PhaedrusWolff@carolina.rr.com)
Date: Sat Jan 08 2005 - 15:13:50 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "MD Intuition"

    Chin earlier)What I believe is that this mystical experience does come from
    > the mind, in that it is intuitive.

    Platt)I also believe mystical experience is intuitive since it is what we
    experience before we put anything into words.

    Chin)Such as in DQ?

    Platt)For me intuition is an endlessly fascinating subject because, as you
    indicate it remains largely a mystery. From what I've read, some of it is
    due to the silent workings of our subconscious. But as you say, it may
    also come from some outside source Whatever. I don't think to know
    mystical experience requires that we enter a monastery for a period of Zen
    training or that we practice Yogi meditation. It's there, right in front
    of us for all to "see" if we pay attention to its silent promptings.

    Chin)First let me apologize for not getting to this earlier, as I was rushed
    and just skimming through the emails, I missed this one.

    If you have read of this intuition, I would like to get a philosophical view
    of it since I have not devoted much time to it. All that I remember reading
    has only been a hint of what I would think intuition would mean. For a
    philosopher, it would mean knowing the color red, or a blind man knowing
    light(?)

    Where this starts to get foggy is like with the Native American who thinks
    of intuition as a connection with their ancestors, or maybe one of the
    original philosophers such as Socrates, who saw his intuition as reasoning,
    but claimed divine intervention. Then you have Nostradamus, Galileo, and
    Einstein. What about the Buddha?

    Then you have my youngest son, who at the age of 11 could take a power
    steering pump, alternator, or water pump off my truck and replace them with
    no prior experience, help or instruction; who could not do school work, but
    score the highest in his school on the end of grade tests.

    What about the other students, who may make 3.9s and 4.0s on Math, but fail
    English Lit, or vice versus?

    I see this also in my online classes, seminars, and discussion boards on
    finance. The folks I have worked with are brilliant and some highly
    accredited, but they just don't get finance (in my view). I have also seen
    this in other fields, but have not advanced myself far enough to draw a
    conclusion.

    Where would you separate intuition from experience? It would seem to me that
    this intuition would fit well into Quality, or the leading edge of the
    train. What Shaw calls the 'Ready-mades' and 'Hand-me-downs' might be the
    same as what Pirsig calls philosophology(?), or static patterns.

    In order to advance in metaphysical thinking, does it not require an
    independent view to some extent? -- as you say, " . . . before we put
    anything into words."

    It would seem to me that a fair explanation of intuition would be the
    cumulative knowledge we have gained since the Greeks, or Buddha, or
    ancestors built up into us through our minds dissected, inspected, rejected
    and injected to a point that we have a better understanding of individual
    views of our ancestors as individual components of our thinking processes
    just as the philosophology plays a part in our developing our own
    independent philosophy, and past scientific experimentation would lend to
    our current scientific experimentations.

    Where this might fit in with the MOQ would be this DQ as the leading edge.
    In chaos, evolution would be the cumulative knowledge of the inorganic
    patterns advancing, just as the cumulative knowledge would advance our
    intellect. Maybe the high intellect we recognize now did not just begin in
    the last century as some have claimed, but has been developing since the
    beginning of time on earth, and has just mushroomed, and possibly has only
    begun to mushroom.

    Maybe this is why Shaw saw fit to write "A Treatise on Parents and Children"
    stating that we need to offer ourselves up as an example of what our
    children should 'Not' be.

    Is it possible our children are born with software built into the brain
    beyond our inductive reasoning capabilities? Is it also possible through
    genetics or ancestors that some are born with a higher degree of inductive
    reasoning capabilities than others?

    I have much to discuss on this, but my main thought on this is that we do
    not advance from a total acceptance of the 'Ready-mades' and 'Hand-me-downs'
    of the Bricks and Mortar Universities. We must look within as well.

    I'll shut down my ramblings for now. :o)

    Chin
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Platt Holden" <pholden@sc.rr.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>; <owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk>
    Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 11:51 AM
    Subject: Re: MD Universal Moral Standards

    > Hi Chin,
    >
    >
    > > What I believe is that this mystical experience does come from
    > > the mind, in that it is intuitive.
    >
    > I also believe mystical experience is intuitive since it is what we
    > experience before we put anything into words.
    >
    > For me intuition is an endlessly fascinating subject because, as you
    > indicate it remains largely a mystery. From what I've read, some of it is
    > due to the silent workings of our subconscious. But as you say, it may
    > also come from some outside source Whatever. I don't think to know
    > mystical experience requires that we enter a monastery for a period of Zen
    > training or that we practice Yogi meditation. It's there, right in front
    > of us for all to "see" if we pay attention to its silent promptings.
    >
    > Thanks for your most interesting response.
    >
    > Best,
    > Platt
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 08 2005 - 15:48:45 GMT