From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sun Jan 09 2005 - 23:19:48 GMT
Hi Scott, dmb, and all,
scott:
There is a sense in which what you say is correct,
namely, that one cannot with intellect come up with a true
description of Reality. And one cannot do so since intellect works by
making distinctions. However, what you are saying in your
philosophical mysticism is that Reality is the One, the
"undifferentiated continuum", or DQ. I say that this leaves one last
dualism to overcome, namely that between the One, on the one hand,
and the so-called "illusion" (the world of distinctions) on the
other.
msh says:
I think what Scott is saying here well expresses my own discomfort
with Pirsig's monism. It's easy to see how one idea, or society, or
organism might be "better" than another, once we are working in our
everyday world of things: we simply compare stuff and make Quality
decisions. But so far I haven't been able to understand the
emergence of the "illusion" of differentiation in the first place.
The magician has some kind of relationship with his audience, after
all.
In an earlier post I asked a question about corrective lenses, which
I believe is getting at the same problem. If we agree that our
visual sense data is improved (made more valuable) by wearing
glasses, then what is the relationship between our eyes, the glasses,
and DQ? If DQ creates the sense data, what is being corrected by our
corrective lenses? If DQ is pre-selecting data based on value, then
it seems that DQ is able to get a little help.
scott:
This can be -- not understood, but at least addressed -- by treating
Reality as that which *creates reality by making distinctions*. All
such small-r reality is impermanent, of course. But, the one is (and
is not) the other. Your (and Pirsig's) philosophy just divides them.
<snip>
Yes, this is a persistent blind spot among people who talk about
mysticism. It is rightfully aware that no symbol is the Reality, but
misses that Reality consists of the continual creation and
destruction of symbols.
msh says:
But this doesn't really answer the question either; it just pushes it
further up the ontological ladder. For Scott, that which *creates
reality by making distinctions* is Consciousness, with a capital C.
Saying that Quality is Conscious, that it creates and destroys
symbols, tells us nothing about how and why. It doesn't offer a
mechanism or suggest a relationship. You're just giving the Magician
a different name.
Just my two cents, properly confused, as usual.
Best to all.
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
-- InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983 Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com "The shadows that a swinging lamp will throw, We come from nowhere and to nothing go." MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archives: Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 09 2005 - 23:24:52 GMT