Re: MD Logic, Analolgy, Metaphor

From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Tue Jan 18 2005 - 21:49:48 GMT

  • Next message: Chuck Roghair: "RE: MD Further comments to Matt"

    Jo,

    I'm offline for a day or two, but my very brief initial response is to point
    out (one of my many ) Neil Hannon quotes.

    Fate doesn't hang by a wrong or right choice.
    Fortune depends on the tone of your voice.

    Ian
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Joseph Maurer" < >
    To: < >
    Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 6:10 PM
    Subject: MD Logic, Analolgy, Metaphor

    > On 10 January 2005 2:04 AM Ian writes to DMB
    >
    > DMB
    >
    > You seem to be saying
    > Vague is bad
    > (Logically precise) is good ?
    > Not sure that is true.
    > Less is often more.
    >
    > Before we destroy it with the analytic knife, I'd like to get at least
    > some
    > vague idea of what mysticism means. I still have no clue.
    >
    > Ian
    >
    >
    > Hi Ian, DMB, and all,
    >
    > Hi Ian, Thank You!! IMO How something is said is more important than what
    > is said? I am thinking of logical speech, analogy, and metaphor. Plain
    > speech accepts what is observed and experienced. "There are things which
    > you have said to me which I do not like. They were not sweet like sugar,
    > but bitter like gourds." Chief Ten Bears, Lila Chapter 3.
    >
    > Analogy accepts the discontinuity of forms, e.g., evolution! Gravity is
    > often an analogue for different forces. Metaphor accepts a faith in
    > awareness in a model of different moral levels. " I was born on the
    > prairie where the wind blew free, and there was nothing to break the light
    > of the sun." ibid. The inorganic-organic level model of speech is logical.
    > "I want to die there, and not within walls." ibid.
    >
    > IMO The social level model of speech is metaphor, e.g., the roles in a
    > family. No one is quite sure apart from organic generation what the roles
    > of father, mother, child etc. mean. Yet social order occurs from an
    > acceptance of roles. Metaphor is in the social order. He/she is leader! An
    > order is observed. When the metaphor of order is used in the intellectual
    > level as a metaphysical tool it becomes dogma. The creation of awareness
    > is seen as a higher level than order. Gravity is seen as a lower level
    > than order. Feeding is seen as a higher level than gravity, but lower than
    > order. IMO This is morality! The assignment of guilt for an action is
    > measured in the awareness level of the individual. The proof of awareness
    > is action, "by their fruits you will know them." Anarchy in Iraq comes
    > from a destruction of an established social order.
    >
    > IMO If I propose existing levels like in evolution I use a social level
    > base. IMO order is the social level. The inorganic, organic, social,
    > intellectual levels in the MOQ are metaphors of DQ. There is no inorganic,
    > organic, intellectual supreme leader. The periodic table of elements is an
    > analogy to the social order. It would seem that an affect on awareness
    > would be a more reasonable base for a periodic table of elements.
    >
    > When metaphor and analogy are combined they evolve, the moral levels
    > occur. 'Supreme' has meaning only in the social level order in the same
    > way the order family, city, king has meaning. Yet the intellectual level
    > is the highest.
    >
    > IMO Analogy is used to express the mystical acceptance of the levels. The
    > term 'like' seems to emphasize the acceptance of different levels. It is
    > analogy to use as an explanation of the causes of WW I & II, the struggle
    > between the intellectual and social levels. Morality is analogy in terms
    > of DQ. However, as analogies, the inorganic, organic, social, and
    > intellectual levels are moral levels of quality everyone accepts, as they
    > accept the analogy of evolution into moral levels.
    >
    > Joe
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Ian Glendinning" < >
    > To: < >
    > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 1:15 AM
    > Subject: Re: MD The MOQ and Mysticism 101
    >
    >
    >> DMB
    >>
    >> You seem to be saying
    >> Vague is bad
    >> (Logically precise) is good ?
    >> Not sure that is true.
    >> Less is often more.
    >>
    >> Before we destroy it with the analytic knife, I'd like to get at least
    >> some
    >> vague idea of what mysticism means. I still have no clue.
    >>
    >> Ian
    >> ----- Original Message -----
    >> From: "David Buchanan" < >
    >> To: < >
    >> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 3:18 AM
    >> Subject: RE: MD The MOQ and Mysticism 101
    >>
    >>
    >>>
    >>> Phaedrus Wolff asked:
    >>> If intuition is not DQ, then what is it?
    >>>
    >>> dmb replies:
    >>> Instinct. A hunch. A feeling. Its a vague word and should be avoided by
    >>> philosophers for that reason, especially if we are trying to distinguish
    >>> instincts and feelings from a mystical experience.
    >>>
    >>> Wolff:
    >>> Just roll a joint instead. Maybe you could join me. It seems at times
    >>> you
    >>> could use one. ...Burn one and get back to me.
    >>>
    >>> dmb replies:
    >>> Are you saying I should relax? Well, OK, but it doesn't matter how
    >>> stress-free I am or how stoned I am, I'll still disagree. Sorry, but I
    >>> did
    >>> promise as much when you first arrived. Remember?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >>> Mail Archives:
    >>> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >>> Nov '02 Onward -
    >> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >>> MD Queries -
    >>>
    >>> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >>> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >> Mail Archives:
    >> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >> Nov '02 Onward -
    >> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >> MD Queries -
    >>
    >> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries -
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries -

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 18 2005 - 23:04:16 GMT