RE: MD newsflash: it's all a con

From: Nick Clair (nclair@webxsol.com)
Date: Mon Jan 24 2005 - 23:04:53 GMT

  • Next message: Adam Watt: "Re: MD newsflash: it's all a con"

    We have been conned? So for the longest time we have been told something
    that isn't true and we have all come to believe it. We believe that in
    democracy and all that but it isn't true. How do we know it's true? Because
    we are told it's true.

    So how do we know it's not true? How can we believe that democracy is all a
    con simply by trusting what you say? What makes us so sure you're not trying
    to con us?

    It's not that I don't believe you or at least suspect the truth in what you
    say; it's just that you offer no more proof that democracy is a con than
    they offer to prove democracy isn't a con.

    I'm very interested. Please go on.

    Sincerely,
    Nick
    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]
    On Behalf Of gav
    Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:52 PM
    To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    Subject: MD newsflash: it's all a con

     with respect guys,

    it amazes me no end how so many of you can spend so
    many hours argiung about left/right wing shit: the
    relative merits of different politics/policies etc
    when, once you dig down a bit, you find that it is all
    a con and pretty much always has been.

    i guess pirsig was unaware of this when he wrote his
    books (i dunno if he is now). and i think that if he
    had known he may not have had to lose it to free
    himself.

    an example:
    in the uk there are three political parties: the
    labour party, the conservatives and the liberal
    democrats. all three parties are headed by members of
    the bilderberg group: an extremely shady rich and
    powerful club that meets regularly at bilderberg
    (which is in belgium i think). no matter who gets in
    in you are being ruled by the same people with the
    same agenda.

    the logos of these three parties are the rose
    (labour), the lighted torch (conservatives), and the
    dove (liberal democrats). all these symbols have
    esoteric meanings related to the lineage of power
    across the centuries. for example the lighted torch (a
    la the statue of liberty) refers to 'illumination' or
    the 'illuminated ones'. this is a freemasonic
    reference: they see themselves (at the highest levels)
    as illuminated because they are privy to ancient and
    esoteric knowledge withheld from the general public.

    the statue of liberty was a gift from parisien
    freemasons to american freemasons. it has nothing to
    do with democracy and freedom, in fact it is about the
    opposite. you have to laugh: we have been conned,
    elegantly, for bloody ages.

    anyway the good news (and bad) is that everything is
    changing. exactly how...????? my feeling at the moment
    is that we are going through an evolutionary
    bottleneck: those that adapt (tune in) survive; those
    that remain stuck in obsolete realities....

    don't get stuck.

    Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
    http://au.movies.yahoo.com

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 24 2005 - 23:09:43 GMT